Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. John provides a theological definition of sin's essential nature. "Committeth sin" (ho poiōn tēn hamartian, ὁ ποιῶν τὴν ἁμαρτίαν) uses the present participle, indicating habitual practice, not isolated acts. The one who makes a practice of sin also "transgresseth the law" (tēn anomian poiei)—literally "does lawlessness."
The explanatory clause "for sin is the transgression of the law" (kai hē hamartia estin hē anomia) defines sin's essence. Anomia (ἀνομία) means lawlessness—rebellion against God's righteous standards, not merely violation of rules but rejection of God's authority. This connects to Reformed theology's understanding that sin is not just wrong actions but a state of rebellion against God's law rooted in a corrupt nature.
This definition has profound implications. First, it establishes objective moral standards—sin is measured against God's law, not cultural preferences or personal feelings. Second, it demonstrates sin's seriousness—it's not weakness or mistake but cosmic treason against the divine Lawgiver. Third, it points to our need for Christ, who fulfilled the law's demands perfectly and bore the penalty for our lawlessness. The law reveals sin; Christ remedies it.
Historical Context
First-century Judaism maintained robust law-keeping as central to covenant faithfulness. The Pharisees meticulously observed Torah and oral traditions. Yet many missed the law's deeper purpose—revealing sin and driving people to God's grace. Paul articulated this in Romans 3:20: "by the law is the knowledge of sin." John builds on this Jewish-Christian understanding that the law defines sin objectively.
Gnostic teachers often dismissed the Old Testament law as obsolete or as the product of an inferior deity. Some promoted libertinism, claiming enlightened ones transcended moral categories. John's definition of sin as lawlessness refutes this, establishing that God's moral standards remain binding and that sin is objectively defined by divine law, not subjectively determined by human feeling.
Questions for Reflection
How does understanding sin as lawlessness (rebellion against God) rather than merely mistakes change your view of your own sin?
If sin is objectively defined by God's law, how should this affect Christian responses to cultural moral relativism?
How does the law's definition of sin drive you to depend on Christ's perfect law-keeping credited to you?
Analysis & Commentary
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. John provides a theological definition of sin's essential nature. "Committeth sin" (ho poiōn tēn hamartian, ὁ ποιῶν τὴν ἁμαρτίαν) uses the present participle, indicating habitual practice, not isolated acts. The one who makes a practice of sin also "transgresseth the law" (tēn anomian poiei)—literally "does lawlessness."
The explanatory clause "for sin is the transgression of the law" (kai hē hamartia estin hē anomia) defines sin's essence. Anomia (ἀνομία) means lawlessness—rebellion against God's righteous standards, not merely violation of rules but rejection of God's authority. This connects to Reformed theology's understanding that sin is not just wrong actions but a state of rebellion against God's law rooted in a corrupt nature.
This definition has profound implications. First, it establishes objective moral standards—sin is measured against God's law, not cultural preferences or personal feelings. Second, it demonstrates sin's seriousness—it's not weakness or mistake but cosmic treason against the divine Lawgiver. Third, it points to our need for Christ, who fulfilled the law's demands perfectly and bore the penalty for our lawlessness. The law reveals sin; Christ remedies it.